Blog Posts

Posted in Uncategorized

Monday Musings: A Room of One’s Own

Many, many years ago, I read Virginia Woolf’s A Room of One’s Own, Woolf’s essay on the need of a woman writer to have her own room for that writing. It was one of those books that made me say, “Wow!” And “Yes!” and “This is Truth!”

I’m thinking it’s time for a reread.

Certain books hit us one way when we’re young and quite another way when we’re…not young. If you read Laura Ingalls Wilder’s The Long Winter as a girl and haven’t read it since, go pick it up again. Especially if you have children. Remember the scene with the blizzard? It’s one thing to read it when you’re somewhere near the age Laura was, when you’re the little girl, and another completely different thing to read it when you’re Ma’s age (okay, no, probably 10-20 years older!) and you’re the mother. With brilliance, Laura–the writer–got both sides into that story.

I think that my original reading of A Room of One’s Own was probably right. I think it is a Yes! book. I think Woolf hit several nails directly on their flat little heads. Still…when I read it, I was 18 or 19, barely out of my parent’s house (and only for 9 months of the year!), safely tucked into a dorm, just starting on my dreams of being a writer who might–someday–need that room of one’s own.

Today, I am in my forties, in my own home, a wife and mother, a writer trying to put fiction on the page and do writing that brings in money as well. And guess what–I have that room of my own. It is a wonderful room–lined with walls of books, surrounded by windows that look out on green oaks and the peeling bark of eucalyptus trees. The room has doors I can close, with stained-glass windows my husband designed, built, and installed for me.

Lucky? You bet.

One of the primary feelings I took from A Room of One’s Own all those years ago was the idea of privacy. Uninterrupted, continuous privacy. The quiet to concentrate, to think, and to write.

One of the other feelings, though, was loneliness. Maybe the flip side of privacy? I remember (or think I do) the feeling that having that room of one’s own came with a strong chunk of isolation. I have carried an image in my mind all these years of that room being the dark corner of an attic, or a garret room in a boarding house. Where no one interrupted, but–also–no one visited.

That’s not my room.

My room has space and light and air. It’s got my desk chair, but it has a futon for guests as well, and a rocking chair where my husband or son sit when they come in for a question or a conversation. I don’t often close those beautiful doors. The cat wanders around, trying to hide between those rows of books or jumping onto the top of my monitor and making everything wobble. (What will she do when I finally get a flat-screen one?) The phone rings. I have Facebook & Twitter, this blog and all the ones I read.

Do I get as much writing done as if I had the other kind of room? I’m guessing not. Is that at times frustrating? Um…yeah. Do I sometimes wish the beautiful doors didn’t just close, but had a deadlock and could be cloaked in invisibility? Of course. Would I swap? No.

I think these thoughts are coming along with the bluer skies of Spring, even if it’s still a bit cold. They’re coming as I get some of life’s to-do tasks checked off the list. They’re coming as the house is quiet and tidy, and Bard the cockatiel is singing and swinging in the other room.

My gut feeling is that the room Virginia Woolf describes is a bit too much like Winter for me. A bit too dark and cold, a bit too set apart from other rooms, with other people in them. If I reread A Room of One’s Own now, I’m pretty sure those images she paints will still have a temptation woven through them. But I’m thinking, too, they may not feel quite the absolute ideal that they did all those years ago.

Posted in Scenes

Friday Five: 5 Quick Things to Remember When You’re Writing a Scene

I’ve been thinking about scenes lately, one of my favorite elements of writing, and thought I’d share.

1. Your hero has to be active. She has to want something and go after it.

2. Your antagonist has to be active. Just like the hero. Even if it’s from behind the scenes.

3. Both goals have to matter. Something has to be at stake; something bad has to result if (almost always when) the hero or antagonist doesn’t succeed.

4. Things have to get worse. Your hero can’t just make one try for the goal, fail, give up, and go back to being okay. He has to do battle, against increasing odds, across the scene. Then he can fail. Badly. (But not give up!)

5. Your hero may have only one antagonist, but that antagonist is not the only place that obstacles come from. Friends cause problems, parents step in the way, your hero becomes self-destructive.  The world itself makes trouble–weather, culture, history—everything can conspire to stop your hero from reaching their goal. Obviously, you’re not going to throw everything all together in one scene, but remember to check out all the choices in the smorgasbord of obstacles, and pick the ones that fit the moment best.

To read more about scene, pick up one or both of these great books: James Scott Bell’s Plot & Structure and Jordan Rosenfeld’s Make a Scene. Then go write a few wonderful scenes of your own.

Posted in Uncategorized

What’s Keeping Me Busy This Week

I’m in one of those phases where it feels like I need silverware dividers for my day–an hour here, an hour and a half here, 43.61 minutes there.

It’s also one of those phases with not as much time for my fiction as I’d like, but life can be like that. I’m working to get chunks of other stuff out of the way, so I can bring clean, clear concentration back to my stories.

Meanwhile, here’s a bit of what I have been doing.

  • Getting ready to present three workshops at the 2011 Pennwriters conference in Pittsburgh next month. I’ll be talking about how to build a critique group, how to develop a strong and supportive critique, and how to revise once you’ve got that pile of feedback.
  • Collecting & fine-tuning some nonfiction samples to share with Laura and Lisa at Mentors for Rent. The more time I spend with history and other nonfiction, the more I want to write in that genre for children. Time to get some coaching from the experts.
  • Working on a VERY SECRET craft project for a niece who is-sometime this month or next–having TWINS! I already have some experience with twins–my grandmother and her sister were identical, as are two of my nephews. BUT I have not yet been a—drumroll, please…GREAT-AUNT!!!!! I could get into this, I think.

  • Receiving stupendous comments on my picture book from my critique partners. Okay, not stupendous, as in, “SEND THIS OUT NOW!” but definitely stupendous in the Duh! Fireworks-of-Ideas way. LOVE those guys!
  • Reading and reading and reading. Unfortunately, not research reading right now, but comfort-relax-escape reading, which I do a LOT of when the rest of the day feels chaotic. Thank goodness for all the wonderful books out there that let me grab a few retreat minutes when I need them. Recent reads that I loved: Rick Riordan’s The Lost Hero, Jim Butcher’s Side Jobs, and Colin Cotterill’s The Coroner’s Lunch.

It’s all great stuff to be doing. Of course, if Stephen Fry showed up on my doorstep offering to be my Jeeves for a few weeks, I would happily hand over the dishes, the grocery shopping, the cooking, the laundry…and so on, and so on.

As would we all, yes?! Happy good-busyness to everyone. 🙂

Posted in Critiquing, Skype

Would You Want to Skype a Critique?

Today’s blog is sort of a mini-survey. Along with my own writing, I’m still doing plenty of critiques for other writers these days. What with the nature of the world, I do a lot of my work online, via email and with much neater feedback in Word than I could ever do with my own handwriting. 🙂 I typically make plenty of comments in the manuscript margins, and I type up the overall critique in a separate file.

Pretty much like I talk about in The Writing & Critique Group Survival Guide.

But I’ve been wondering. I know there are plenty of writers who critique together online. I’ve started doing that myself, on top of my in-person critique group, and it works well for me. I only miss the coffeehouse atmosphere a little. On the other hand, I think there are still writers who are most comfortable face-to-face, actually hearing their critique delivered out loud, even if it’s the same one they take home on paper to look at later, during revision. I think they feel more happy with the chance to ask immediate questions, get things clarified, and do a bit of brainstorming about specific problems that have been worrying them.

So then I thought…Skype.

I hear wonderful things about Skype school visits. I’m getting close to hiring Laura Purdie Salas and Lisa Bullard at Mentors for Rent, to help me pull together some samples I want to send out. That consulting session will be via Skype, and I’m looking forward to it. Both Lisa and Laura are “there” at the conference, and I think it’ll be much easier to have a three-way conversation when I can sort of see who’s talking when. Easier, more relaxed, and–I’m guessing–very helpful. Skype mentoring.

And maybe Skype critiquing.

I’d love to hear your thoughts. Let’s make it all hypothetical. If you were going to hire a freelance editor to critique part or all of your book, would you like the idea of being able to talk to them in person, as well as get their written feedback? Would you, if you were already paying a page-rate for the critique, think it worthwhile to pay for an additional hour of time, to get that face-to-face delivery of the critique? Or would you just feel like it was more technology you  had to figure out and equip yourself for?

Please do leave a comment with your thoughts. All opinions welcome!

Posted in Uncategorized

Saturday Six: How to Procrastinate

1. Spend a couple of hours with the TV on, in the name of making progress on a craft project.

2. Decide that you’re going to do your day’s work on your new laptop. Which is so new as to have numerous features that must be figured out.

3. Get caught up in son’s homework, where neither of you really wants you to be.

4. Eat another small spoonful of Trader Joe’s Almond Butter with Flax Seeds.

5. Think about that newsletter you’re not writing.

6. Blog.

Posted in Uncategorized

Spring Break Getaway

We didn’t get a big vacation this spring break–most of the week has been filled with work-work and homework (which totally stinks, may I say?!), but also with some extra sleeping and reading time, which I’ll always take.

We did, however, escape on Monday and Tuesday for a much-needed break. My son slept in, my husband and I worked till noon, then we pretty much tossed clothes, sleeping bags, and a cooler into the car and drove south. We stopped for a great lunch here in Santa Cruz, bought a couple of paperbacks each here, then hit Trader Joe’s to fill up the cooler. Then we drove another 40 minutes or so further south, to Mount Madonna County Park.

Where they have yurts.

I love yurts. They come equipped with bunk beds and futons, and a light in the ceiling that the ranger thought wouldn’t be bright enough to read by…WRONG! Plenty of light for bedtime reading. Each yurt has its own little wrap-around deck and BBQ pit. We’d picked up steaks and frozen fries (which we wrapped in foil), and we tossed it all on the BBQ to cook. Okay, my husband and son tossed it on the BBQ. I put on four layers of clothing, dug out the copy of Ellis Peter’s Monkshood that I’d read years ago and decided was perfect for a cozy, nostalgic re-peruse, and stayed as close to the fire as I could without getting smoked out.

April is chilly this year, to say the least!

The next morning, we pulled out our map of the park and started off to circumnavigate the whole thing. Mount Madonna is not a big park–the brochure says it has 20-miles of trails, but I wouldn’t bet on that. Still, we hiked and ate and hiked and ate and hiked and snoozed in the sun for close to seven hours, and it was wonderful.

If you’re ever hiking through the park, and you see a little sign in the middle of nowhere that says, “Rest Area,” follow the deer path. Someone (??!!) decided it was a great idea to tote a picnic table two miles from the nearest road and tuck it into a glade totally hidden from the main trail. We agreed. Lunch was secluded and cozy.

I can highly recommend these:


And my son discovered that a Trader Joe’s Triple Ginger Snap on top of a slice of hard salami makes a delicious open-faced sandwich. (Honestly and frighteningly, it wasn’t bad!)

We saw plenty of these, but did not make them part of the dining experience.


It was tough to come back, but “luckily,” I totally overused most of my leg muscles, so sitting at the computer hasn’t been the worst thing I could be doing. It’s not turning out to be much of a week for writing, and next week probably won’t be either, but I’m trying to get work-stuff out of the way so I can return full-force to my WIPs as soon as possible.

Happy Spring to you all!

Posted in Book Review, YA Historical Fiction Challenge

YA Historical Fiction Challenge: THE YEAR WE WERE FAMOUS

Let’s just start out with the basic statement: I loved this book.

I love the idea of two women walking cross-country from Washington to New York in 1896. I love the idea of their doing it with  no cooking utensils, plans to work for food and lodging along the way, and a bet that–if they do it–will win them $10,000 to save their farm, pay for college, and put the frosting on what may be the biggest adventure (exciting and miserable) of their lives.

I really love that it actually happened.

Okay, no, not exactly as Carole Estby Dagg has written it. The author is very clear in her notes about how much she does know about Helga and Clara (her great-grandmother and great-aunt) and what she doesn’t. Which is nice, because by the end of the book, that’s one thing I was definitely curious about.

What Dagg has done, though, and what I loved is to take the bones of a story that has obviously fascinated her for years and turned it into one that kept me reading through every page–every blister, every gully-washer, every gunshot, and every tedious (for the characters only) mile across the U.S.

In many ways, it’s just a great story told very well. Dagg uses the bet’s deadline to set up and sustain tension, as well as all the physical and emotional obstacles the two women face along the way. She explores the relationship between Helga and Clara, a relationship that only makes their trip more difficult, more challenging. She sets up a love-triangle for Clara, amazingly developed, when you figure that the two men involved never meet each other and are never physically involved in the journey for more than a few hours of time.

But what I really loved about this book was the journey. I mean, think about it. At one point in the story, Clara hits another woman with an accusation: “How many miles a day do you walk? Two miles, three?” It’s a wonderful moment, and the woman totally deserves the hit, but–hey–how many of us walk even that short distance unless it comes under the heading of Exercise?And Clara and Helga, as she says, have walked anywhere from twenty-five to fifty miles every day of their trip. In rain. In snow. In heat.

IN CORSETS.

No, I don’t want to go back, not for real. I don’t miss corsets. I don’t miss long skirts. I don’t miss working on a farm or chopping wood for a piece of bread and a cup of coffee.

Oh, I do love reading about it all, though. Especially when someone like Ms. Dagg does such a wonderful job of catching it all on the page for me–the humdrum and the amazing. The reality.

Posted in Uncategorized

THE MONSTER’S RING Winner!

Who’s bright idea was it to have a contest end on a Monday morning? Of Spring Break? Oh, yeah, that would be me.

It’s okay. I’m here, and I’m awake. Mostly!

And I’ve got the winner for my giveaway of a signed copy of Bruce Coville’s The Monster’s Ring.

Katrina, Come On Down!!!! You can email me at beckylevine at ymail dot com with your snail mail address, and I’ll get the book sent off to you soon.

Enjoy!

And Happy Monday to everybody else. 🙂

Posted in Conference Report

Friday Five: SCBWI Spring Spirit Conference

Okay, here’s the last of the posts about my trip up to Sacramento and the 2011 Spring Spirit Conference. You’ve got a couple more days to enter my contest for a signed copy of Bruce Coville’s The Monster’s Ring, by leaving a comment at last Monday’s post about Bruce’s keynote speech.

For today, a few conference highlights:

1. The conference basically rocked. The energy of the whole day was wonderful, partly because of the great speakers and workshops, partly because I just love hanging out with kidlit writers. I have to say, though, I think a lot of that energy came directly from the coordinators and volunteers. So thanks to everybody, including the main organizers: Erin Dealey, Patti Newman, and Genny Heikka. We are lucky to have you guys!

2. I sat in on some excellent workshops, particularly Susan Buckley’s talk about writing nonfiction for children and Christy Webster’s session on what else we might be writing for young kids, than picture books. Both speakers sparked ideas and goals in my head, even if I don’t know exactly where those are going to take me. Both Susan and Christy clearly love what they do and get how challenging and fun writing for children can be. If I had to summarize both workshops really fast, I’d say Story, Story, Story!

3. I dropped the first page of my picture book into a basket for Quinlan Lee’s first-page critique session. Let me tell you, when I hear people ask, “How can anyone tell if something’s working or not on the first page?”–they can! No, they can’t tell whether the story is great after that page, they can’t tell if the story is seriously “close” and just needs a bit more revision, but it is possible to get a strong idea about what might/might not be ready and even a little bit about why. Quinlan is incredibly sharp–her critiques were fast, spot on, and always respectful and kind. Oh, and her lunchtime keynote speech had a picture of herself at nine-years-old, sitting on a hillside, reading The Witch of Blackbird Pond for the fourth time. In other words, a picture of why we write. Perfect.

4. I met Bruce Coville. I shook his hand, thank him for his books, and–oh, yeah–gushed a little. (Oh, you would have, too!) Then I watched and listened to him give a keynote speech that had him leaving his microphone behind, climbing onto a chair, brainstorming a make-it-worse-for-your-character with voices, and basically reminding us with humor and conviction who these kids are we’re writing for and what they want to read.

5. The day was filled with meetings–people I’d met before, people I’ve gotten to know online (every third conversation started with, “Have we met, or do I know you from Facebook?!”), ate and hung out with new and old friends (Thanks to Catherine Meyer, Cheri Williams, Tiare Williams Solorzano, Nancy Laughlin, & Claudine Rogers!) I bought books, talked writing and critiquing, and just soaked up all the creativity and motivation.

Wonderful day. I highly recommend a dose of conference time for you all!

Posted in Research

Research Trip…Cars, Cars, Cars!

So Monday’s post was about Bruce Coville’s keynote speech at the Spring Spirit conference, and I still haven’t gotten around to writing up a summary post of the whole conference. Friday, maybe? Anyway, f you haven’t read the Monday post yet, and you’d like to enter my giveaway for a signed copy of Bruce’s The Monster’s Ring, go here and leave a comment.

Today, I want to talk about cars.

After I signed up for the conference, and after I decided to go up Friday and spend the night ahead of time, and as I was researching what kind of cars my MC would be riding around in, I discovered that the California Automobile Museum is in Sacramento, barely 30 minutes from Rocklin, where the conference was being held. So guess what I decided to do on Friday afternoon?

I drove up to Sac, had lunch, then showed up at the doors of the museum. I’d emailed the curator ahead of time, so he knew I was coming (although I’m not sure he know what kind of conversations we’d be having….”Wow, that brass trim on the windshield would be a lovely place to smack someone head during a car wreck, wouldn’t it?”). He was a wonderful person, took me around and showed me all the relevant cars, helped me understand what was standard for the time and what was different between the more luxurious cars and, oh, say…the Model T. Yes, the cars came with a toolbox on their running board (no trunk), not to mention an acetylene tank and generator for lighting the headlights. Well, okay, you needed a match, too. SERIOUSLY!

I had a wonderful time, took tons of notes, and after we were done talking, he left me to wander through the museum and take lots of pictures. Some of which I’m going to share with you–just remember that I’m a lousy photographer, I was taking these with my Blackberry (because I’m so lousy I don’t do any better with a real camera!), and these are the best of the lot! So everything in the museum was even more beautiful than it will look to you here.

Here are some shots of the cars I needed to see for research purposes. (Keep in mind I’m a lousy photographer!)

Here’s a 1908 Model T, which was before they only came in black.

Here’s a 1912 Cadillac Torpedo.

And here’s a 1926 Cunningham ambulance. Later than my period, but the same company was making ambulance back in 1911/1912. They were also making hearses, but let’s not go there.


And here are a few of the pics I sent to my husband, just to drive him crazy with the pretty-please emails. Note: He is not a Citroen fan. I think they look like particularly cute armadillos.

I have always wanted one of these.

And don’t we all think this is the tow truck from the movie Cars? The one that went out to the pasture to do some tractor-tipping? Only this one doesn’t have a speck of rust.

It was a great afternoon. I felt a bit like a character out of Firefly, because everything was “Shiny!”  If you’re ever up in Sacramento, I recommend this museum as a stop, especially if you have any car-crazies in your family!